in A, you give examples of gender specifics: “menstruation (men don’t do it), kids (men don’t make ‘em).”
in B, you want “insight into the human (genderless!) condition.”
this is a clear contradiction. the human condition can never be genderless. gender equality shouldn’t - and can’t - mean genderlessness. you don’t have to pretend there are no differences between the genders to have gender equality.
-
thejulydiaz liked this
-
andrewjcrawford reblogged this from thisisnthelpful and added:
Of course humor is not about periods but without them everything would just be one giant run on sentence thought after...
-
jusky liked this
-
electricband liked this
-
ashleywyeah reblogged this from witstream and added:
gender specifics: “menstruation...condition.” this...clear...
-
slackmistress reblogged this from witstream and added:
on: women. Comedy. Fuck yeah.
-
slackmistress liked this
-
juicymorsel liked this
-
flyoverjoel liked this
-
iamnotdiddy liked this
-
thisisnthelpful reblogged this from witstream
-
thisisnthelpful liked this
-
thebosha liked this
-
bananacasts liked this
-
hisnameslen liked this
-
afrosandyamakas liked this
-
trixieboots reblogged this from witstream and added:
again take issue with...suggestion that what...women—in...
-
allhailjerry liked this
-
smackofham liked this
-
samgrittner liked this
-
braindeadcuestatic liked this
-
lafix liked this
-
nanoblossom liked this
-
sucittam liked this
-
bettylies liked this
-
animinimalism liked this
-
froggeek liked this
-
dailyhuff liked this
-
witstream posted this
